On April 12th, three contributors to the creation of iPad apps visited SU to talk about their experiences with the application business and their views on how technology is changing how people consume media. Eric Gillin, David Griffin and Jennifer Brook, each specializing in different areas, shared their views on the developmental process of creating apps and what they think makes them so appealing.
When discussing the major differences between good and bad apps, the metaphors just kept on rolling. Brook characterized a good app as being like a ride in a theme park. It needs to be fun and exciting; it needs to have enough appeal to make people come back and “ride” it not just a second time, but a third and a fourth. Another comparison made was to a toaster. A good app has a single purpose that “plugs” into a network for info. A specific app for a specific purpose is the concept that all three agreed upon being an important characteristic of any app. Too many times, apps can be overwhelming and way too convoluted. There’s no need for every app to be able to perform a million and one functions to appeal to the consumers. Doing one thing, and one thing well attracts people much more because you know what to expect; you learn to trust that it’ll perform to your standards every time. Now, I don’t know if most people would agree with this, but I certainly do. I wouldn’t call my self an apple fan-girl, but I’m definitely a sucker for the new flashy gadgets Apple continuously releases, but the biggest problem I have with not only Apple but new technology in general is its need to overcompensate. It seems like every new smart phone or laptop has to perform more tasks than its predecessors to be better and worth buying. I remember my mom once asking me “Don’t people use phones just to make calls anymore?” and in response, I gave a nice little eye roll and walked away; but while I do love technology and the convenience of having one device fulfill multiple purposes, sometimes it becomes unnecessarily convoluted. So having these apps, which are a major part of iPads, iPhones (and other smart phones), and iPods, be less complicated makes the usage of these gadgets way less overwhelming. It’s a simple case of quality being better than quantity.
Brook went on to discuss technology not necessarily being the “go to” tool for all consumers. Society is not necessarily headed for a purely technologically driven way of life; it’s not about print and iPads and smart phones being separate entities because they are all integrated into people’s lives. An example Brook used to demonstrate this point was a man who wakes up before the newspaper hits his door step so be uses the paper’s app on his iPad, and when the paper comes be reads that. On the way to work he uses his iPhone, and when he arrives he goes to the website on his computer. It’s not about the format the content is in, it’s about the content. People will use whichever outlet best fits their lives at that moment. I found this to be an interesting outlook; people always seem discuss of how all media is headed to a solely digital outlet and I never really understood why it mattered so much that this happen. People don’t always need nor want to be plugged into technology all the time. Sometimes it’s nice to turn off the computer and phone and read a book or magazine instead, but more than that sometimes print and digital formats individually suit people’s lives better at different times. But Brook feels that eventually all things will go digital but not necessarily loose the feeling of print. She believes technology and digital outlets will become less overwhelming; eventually the consumers won’t feel like they’re always “plugged in” to this huge system. When reading a magazine on their iPads, they’ll feel like they would when reading a printed magazine except it’ll be on their iPad’s. Technology doesn’t always have to be complicated; it can still be simple and clear and relaxing if it just slows down a little. When this happens, people won’t have the need to get away from it; they won’t turn to print for solace. They’ll be able to have the same experiences of reading print while maintaining the convenience of technology.
All in all, the three of them really gave some interesting insight into their thoughts of not only iPad applications, but the world of new media and technology as well.



